Documented: Parex Bank and Tambovskaya Mafia

Attached below is a document dated 29 May 2015 by the “Fiscalia Especial Contra la Corrupcion y la Criminalidad Organizada.”  It is the case prepared by Spain against Vladimir Putin’s Tambovskaya Mafia.  The Tambovskaya are involved in looting governments, international heroin trafficking, and murdering informants.  The wars in Chechnya and Ukraine in which tens of thousands of people were killed could also be blamed on Tambovskaya.

It was already known that Mikhail Rebo (sometimes spelled Rabo) was the main money launderer for Tambovskaya and his wife Tatiana Rebo was manager of the Parex Bank office in Berlin.  Now we have more details.

Parex Bank is mentioned in the document on pages 130, 137, 276, 277, 278, 379, 380, and 392.  Parex sister company International Overseas Services is mentioned on page 130.  Several other notorious Latvian banks are mentioned throughout.

Parex is mentioned again on pages 404, 405, and 406 including specific mention of Tatiana Rebo.  Throughout the document there are references of money going through Latvia and Germany, with Germany sometimes used to mean Parex Bank Berlin.

Page 429 mentions “Rabinovich” who owns a store in Riga.  This could be a reference to Parex shareholder Grigory Rabinovich who was a close friend of the Parex oligarchs.  When Parex was looted prior to the handover of Parex liabilities to European taxpayers, the bank made a fake unrecoverable loan to Rabinovich which seemed to be a refund of the money he paid to purchase Parex shares.  The other minority shareholders including Americans and Swedes didn’t get refunds.  Obviously this was illegal however nobody got punished except taxpayers.

On page 429 starts a discussion of “Chaika” who seems to be Russian General Prosecutor Yuri Chaika who is known to have laundered money through Latvia, and “Vova” who is Vladimir Putin.

The Latvian government and European Bank for Reconstruction and Development have been running a propaganda and disinformation campaign since 2009 to blame the disappearance of the assets of Parex on the United States and Sweden.  Even though it was already revealed in 2014 that the Latvia/EBRD/Parex bailout of 2009 was a cover-up fraud, most newspapers refuse to publish truthful articles and are still sticking with the United States/Sweden story.

The signer of the fraud, Valdis Dombrovskis, is now European Commission Vice President responsible for the integrity of the euro.  Another fraud organizer, Bank of Latvia Governor Ilmars Rimsevics, is on the council of the European Central Bank.  The ECB is the largest investor in Latvian bonds and Rimsevics knows that the bonds were issued fraudulently to bailout a Russian Mafia bank.  The only person Latvia prosecuted in connection with the fraud bailout was whistleblower Ilmars Poikans who exposed Rimsevics for paying a huge bonus to himself after organizing the fraud.

AL JUZGADO

 

After Dishonest Election Victory, PM Admits Fraud

After telling lies to Latvian voters for five years, the ruling political party has admitted that the sale of Parex Bank stock to the EBRD was fake because it was secretly reversible.  Of course, the prime minister waited until after the election last month to inform the public.

Unfortunately the Bloomberg article below doesn’t explain the implications:  Latvia has been understating its deficit and debt for five years, violating agreements with the IMF and EU.  The article also doesn’t mention that Parex was a corrupt and fraudulent offshore bank with links to the Kremlin, and the people who looted the assets of Parex weren’t prosecuted.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-28/latvia-plans-to-pay-ebrd-for-its-investment-in-parex-banka.html

Eurostat confirms Dombrovskis’ fraud

Eurostat has written a letter confirming that Valdis Dombrovskis’ deal to sell Parex Bank stock to the EBRD in 2009 was a fraud.  The “sale” was actually a “loan” because Latvia must buy back the stock.  The Eurostat letter indicates another fraud also:  when Latvia gave free Citadele stock (the EBRD bought Parex stock, not Citadele stock) to the EBRD this should have been recorded as an expense.  Latvia is required, according to the illegal deal, to buy back the Citadele stock for an unknown price at an unknown time.  However, Latvia made the deal “confidential.”  We thought “confidential” was for military secrets.  How can the national debt be “confidential” from voters, taxpayers, and creditors?  We hope the next government will repudiate the debt and sue the EBRD to take back the Citadele stock.

Eurostat letter September 2014